당신이 알아야 할 것들의 증가 속도는 당신이 아는 것들의 증가 속도보다 크다
  • 🌈고용 노동자의 소양 : 기여, 보상 그리고 뻔뻔함
  • LLM에게 좌뇌를
  • Going to AI
  • 세대론 유감
  • LIST
    • 어쩌다, 애자일스러움
    • Graph Databases - 올 것은 온다
    • Software Composability in Crypto
    • The Next Decade in AI: Four Steps Towards Robust Artificial Intelligence
    • AI 에듀테크 - 교육절벽은 없다?
    • The Design of Decisions
    • How Modern Game Theory is Influencing Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Systems
    • 블록체인과 콘텐츠의 왕국 (작성중)
    • How to grow a mind: statistics, structure, and abstraction [paper]
  • Text
    • 코딩, 몇살까지
    • '타다'가 드러낸 한국 4대 빅이슈
    • [딴지일보]MMORPG적 세계관과 능력주의자라는 환상
    • #n
    • 장면들
  • 임시
    • PAGE
      • 마이크로서비스 아키텍처
      • SHACL
      • IPLD / Multiformats
      • MPC
      • Semantic BlockChain
      • Java Stream
      • 인공지능과 교육
      • [scrap] The Future of Data: A Decentralized Graph Database
      • DAG - 방향성 비순환 그래프(Directed Acyclic Graph)
      • Untitled
Powered by GitBook
On this page

Was this helpful?

  1. LIST

The Design of Decisions

PreviousAI 에듀테크 - 교육절벽은 없다?NextHow Modern Game Theory is Influencing Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Systems

Last updated 4 years ago

Was this helpful?

소위 의사결정 도구들을 일상생활에서도 유용하게 활용하게 될 날이 오기를 기대하고 있는데. 인공지능 기반으로는 아직 쉽지 않아 보이네요.

The results from this [ACM Queue] experiment, however, suggest that merely providing humans with algorithms that outperform them in terms of accuracy does not necessarily lead to better outcomes. When participants incorporated the algorithm’s risk score into their decision-making process, the accuracy rate of their predictions did not significantly change. The inclusion of a written advisement providing information about potential biases in the algorithm did not affect participant accuracy, either. — Vaccaro.

The Design of DecisionsMedium
Logo